<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ugly Math</title>
	<link>http://msco.com/blog/ugly-math</link>
	<description>My Unconventional Thinking on strategic management, marketing, consulting, business, advertising, and general philosophizing on the issues of the day. It's the perfect blend of Harvard Business School and Us Magazine.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 11:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Durant</title>
		<link>http://msco.com/blog/ugly-math#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Durant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 14:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://msco.com/blog/ugly-math#comment-178</guid>
		<description>Mark,
  Great post and I could not agree more.  I own a sales outsourcing company and maximizing revenue/results from each of my reps is at the core of my company strategy.  We focus our energy on making each rep better in all aspect of their sales life.  Not by seminars but by strength and weakness meetings.  Those of us with strengths in one area work with those who don't and visa versa.

Best Regards,

Eric Durant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
  Great post and I could not agree more.  I own a sales outsourcing company and maximizing revenue/results from each of my reps is at the core of my company strategy.  We focus our energy on making each rep better in all aspect of their sales life.  Not by seminars but by strength and weakness meetings.  Those of us with strengths in one area work with those who don&#8217;t and visa versa.</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Eric Durant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Kieff</title>
		<link>http://msco.com/blog/ugly-math#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Kieff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 22:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://msco.com/blog/ugly-math#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Ron,
You're absolutely right.  We edited the numbers and tried to make it easier to read, and in the process lost the bubble.
It's good to see you focused on the idea, not the flawed math.
Thanks,
Chris, Producer of Unconventional Thinking</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron,<br />
You&#8217;re absolutely right.  We edited the numbers and tried to make it easier to read, and in the process lost the bubble.<br />
It&#8217;s good to see you focused on the idea, not the flawed math.<br />
Thanks,<br />
Chris, Producer of Unconventional Thinking</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron Wilson</title>
		<link>http://msco.com/blog/ugly-math#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 15:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://msco.com/blog/ugly-math#comment-176</guid>
		<description>Mark,

Not to pick nits, but wouldn't 3,000 x $1,000,000 x 20% = a $360 million increase to the top line?

Great point, though.  Small, regular increases that are the result of singles and doubles usually outperform the occasional home run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>Not to pick nits, but wouldn&#8217;t 3,000 x $1,000,000 x 20% = a $360 million increase to the top line?</p>
<p>Great point, though.  Small, regular increases that are the result of singles and doubles usually outperform the occasional home run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
